🔗 Share this article

I have some opinions regarding the remarks made by the sports network broadcaster Chris Fowler following Novak Djokovic's victory over Taylor Fritz during the New York major quarter-finals. Consider – Fritz is American, the commentator is from the US – and athletic competitions often encourage patriotic sentiment. A little bit of disappointment would have been understandable. Rather, he invoked the ongoing drought of American men at grand slam tournaments: none of them had lifted a title since the last American champion in 2003, and Fritz had been the final representative in the tournament.

Everyone enjoy a narrative, myself included. But really. Suppose the American had beaten Djokovic for the initial occasion, force of nature the Spanish star was looming in the next round, whom he has never defeated in an competitive encounter. And if he’d somehow survived that, it would have been defending champion Jannik Sinner, versus him Fritz had lost 10 of the previous eleven sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also split the previous seven major titles (plus the Spaniard went on to defeat a tired Djokovic in the next round). Fritz stated in press after the loss that he in fact preferred his path, because it offered the chance to defeat the top three competitors in the sport in succession. Fritz is well within his right to aim for the achievement; an competitor is meant to believe in themselves. But going into that Djokovic last eight match what other person in their right mind had the drought of American champions on the brain?

Coco Gauff’s second serve the sole barrier between her and consistent victories

The American, 28, is ranked number four in the world starting the upcoming year-end championships and has won his last six encounters over third-ranked Alexander Zverev with increasing ease. Presumably he could take that spot for himself in the coming years. But it’s clear that right now, that’s as far as he can climb: The Italian and Spaniard lie a chasm of performance metrics away. His elite serve and powerful strength on both front side and reverse side are sufficiently enough to dispose of most rivals on the ATP tour. When facing the handful of generational talents, however, he is frequently helpless. The last several years has seen the curious emergence of tall, gangly players who can nevertheless move around with the surprising quickness and fluidity of much shorter players. Fritz is six-foot-five and looks it. His movement is rigid, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his limbs. So he’ll rarely steal a point that the other player was dictating, and playing a drop shot versus him is usually a reliable tactic. That acts as a quite severe limitation on his upside.

Fritz has made a several significant, improbable advancements throughout his career. Early on of the decade, he was hovering around the lower end of the top 30. Two years later, he was approaching the elite ten. The previous season, he suddenly exploded up to No 4 – and maintained the spot. But the next leap, mixing it up with and beating all-time-greats like the young Spaniard, the Italian, and including a declining Djokovic, is the toughest of all. What was Fowler have been thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to beat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate commenting on the ongoing drought of American men lifting grand slams when Fritz had exited the US Open in the quarter-finals? The desperation is just too much and the respect for the difficulty of the challenge insufficient.

The American star made a career-best advancement to the All England Club last four in the summer.

The American's performance in that very last eight match ought to have been enough of an sign. The Serbian triumphed in four rounds, a victory that only seemed uncertain for brief periods towards the conclusion, when Fritz had saved a few match points and had a opportunity to hold for 5-5. The pair appeared evenly matched during the exchanges, with the American creating plenty of opportunities to win the opponent's serve. But Djokovic saved service break opportunity after service break opportunity, prolonging the run to the point of agony. When he eventually did convert a single of the opportunities at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he promptly produced a horrendous service game to lose his own serve once more; Djokovic had lulled him into a skirmish peripheral to the real battle and compelled him to use far too much energy to prevail. Facing set points in the final game, his primary delivery sailed to heaven. He extended the match two times on his second serve, but finally double-faulted. It was not a collapse, I didn’t think, only a consequence of having to hit an excessive number of second serves.

The contest was fairly compelling proof that the American is insufficiently skilled to beat any form of the Serbian, that lost to the Spaniard in the following match and did not especially appeared like he thought he could win. This is perfectly fine – the Serbian is the best player ever, and might not be at the peak of his athletic abilities anymore, but has developed enough experience and tactical know-how to compensate for a significant portion of the drop-off. The problem is the individuals who were anticipating Fritz to prevail, and putting pressure on him to achieve that, when he was had not done anything that indicated he would.

The American is an valuable contributor to the circuit nonetheless. He’s a patient, reflective voice in press conferences, more so than virtually anyone on the ATP except for Daniil Medvedev, willing to not just express how he feels or the strategy he believed determined a contest, but clarify it. That he ought to bear the brunt of the blame for America failing to spawn a male major champion since Andy Roddick seems unjust. (Since Ben Shelton is rubbing shoulders with him in the standings, maybe they can divide that load.)

ATP Finals: Singles Groups

Jimmy Connors Group

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• The American contender
• The Australian speedster
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Bjorn Borg Division

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• The rising American
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I’d probably think about it forever if I fail to do it,” Fritz told a journalist in the summer of winning a grand slam. It is hoped he realizes that he’s not unsuccessful if he doesn’t fulfill that objective, that breaking through the Spanish and Italian's dominant, formidable reign is actually highly improbable for everybody else. {